Darnbogue, Cowie, Stirlingshire

Enclosure:  OS Grid Reference – NS 8618 8848

Also Known as:

  1. Castleton (north)
  2. Darnbog

Archaeology & History

Site locale with rock art

In the fields immediately above the northernmost of the Castleton petroglyphs, there was, in bygone times, a prehistoric settlement, forgotten and cast even from folk memory until very recently, when aerial photography revealed the ghostly outline of its former existence.  Similar in design, but somewhat smaller than the prehistoric Gallamuir enclosure a half-mile southwest of the Castleton carvings, this double-ringed oval enclosure—thought by archaeologists to have been defined all round with large wooden stakes, or palisaded—measures, from outer edge to outer edge, 65 yards (SE to NW) across its longer axis, by 55 yards (SW to NE).  The gap between the trenches that define the inner and outer wooden ‘walls’ is between five and six yards apart all round it.  The entrance to the enclosure seems to have been on its southeastern side—although an excavation is needed to be sure about this.  Sadly, almost nothing can be seen of the site at ground level.  An archaeo-dig would be a good idea. 🙂

Rough sketch of site-plan

‘Palisade enclosures’ tend to be neolithic in origin and were in use for many centuries, sweeping into the Bronze Age.  I highlight this long period in time due to the proximity of the extensive and very ornate cup-and-ring carvings that start just 300 yards southwest of the settlement on the first rock outcrop that you meet.  It’s a good one too!  Petroglyphs were also created mainly during the neolithic and Bronze Age periods; and as the enclosure here is on the slight rise in the land overlooking the various small rocky ridges below, many of which are decorated in ornate cup-and-rings, it’s likely that some of the people who lived here were probably the people who did them…

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian 

Gallamuir, Cowie, Stirlingshire

Settlement:  OS Grid Reference – NS 8455 8772

Archaeology & History

Faint aerial outline

Just over a half-mile (1km) south-west of the major rock art complex at Castleton, in the fields just east of Gallamuir Farm on the north side of the B9124 road, could once be seen a decent double-ringed enclosure, prehistoric in nature.  At ground level today there is nothing to be seen as agricultural practices have ever so slowly eroded it away.  It wasn’t in a good state when the dudes from Royal Commission (1963) had a look at it in October, 1951—although they did tell us that some faint remnants were discernible, but it was fading fast!  They wrote:

“No traces of this structure can normally be seen on the surface, but at the date of visit, when the site was covered with wheat stubble, stretches of both ditches were clearly visible, as shown on the plan (below), by reason of the stronger growth of the stubble overlying them.  The ditches are from 20ft to 30ft apart, and the enclosed area measures 300ft from ESE to WNW, by about 240ft transversely.  Two narrow gaps in the inner ditch on the north and east arcs respectively, may represent original entrances.”

Outline sketch of the enclosure
Royal Commission plan

Nothing remains of it today apart from the shadow-marks of its former existence when looked down from above.  The double embankment that constituted the enclosure initially suggested it to be Iron Age in nature, akin to the larger hillforts up and down the country, but the outline is more consistent of a standard settlement enclosure.  As far as I’m aware, no excavations have taken place here, so we’re at a loss to know whether the people living here had anything to do with the rock art just across the fields at Castleton.  If we found that it had a Bronze Age or neolithic date, a connection could be likely.  But we may have to look at the enclosure immediately north of the Castleton complex to be more sure of our petroglyphic culprits….

References:

  1. Lock, Gary & Ralston, Ian, An Atlas of Hillforts of Great Britain and Ireland, Edinburgh University Press 2022.
  2. Royal Commission on the Ancient & Historical Monuments Scotland, Stirling – volume 2, HMSO: Edinburgh 1963.
  3. Royal Commission on the Ancient & Historical Monuments of Scotland, Archaeological Sites and Monuments of Stirling District, Central Region, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 1979.

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian 

Castleton (4d), Cowie, Stirlingshire

Cup-and-Ring Stone:  OS Grid Reference – NS 85538 88150

Getting Here

The Castleton (4d) carving

If you start from the Castleton (2) carving, in the first small birch copse closest to the road, walk to its southeast side where there’s a small break before the next small birch copse begins which runs along the raised rocky crag to the southeast.  Walk along the back lower east-side of these birches for about 100 yards until you reach a break in the copse (the next lot of trees are another 30-40 yards further on) and from here walk up the slope onto the first flat piece of rock on the crag itself.  Zigzag hereabouts until you’re about two or three yards from the edge.

Archaeology & History

Single cup-and-ring

Once this rock surface is covered again by Nature’s carpet, you’ll struggle to find it.  Unlike many of its more ornate neighbours, this seems to be a lonely solitary cup-and-ring design, cut near the edge of a large level piece of otherwise blank rock.  Numerous geological nicks and scratches scatter the same surface, but the carved element is easy enough to see, as the photos here show.  It was rediscovered in the 1980s by Morris & van Hoek (1986) who described it simply as “a single cup and one ring, 8cm in diameter on horizontal rock.”  There may well be additional elements to this design beneath the soil.

References:

  1. Morris, Ronald W.B. & van Hoek, Maarten, “Stirling District: Castleton 4d; Castleton 5e,” in Discovery & Excavation, Scotland, 1986.

Acknowledgments:  Massive thanks to Thomas Cleland for helping to make this site visible again.

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian

Castleton (7e), Cowie, Stirlingshire

Cup-and-Ring Stone:  OS Grid Reference – NS 85516 88205

Getting Here

Tom Cleland’s new find

Start from the Castleton (2) carving, in the first small birch copse closest to the road and walk to its southeast side where there’s a small break in the trees before the next small birch copse begins, which runs along the raised rocky crag to the southeast.  Walk to the front or western side of the trees there and along the very edge of the low crag.  About thirty yards along, right on the edge of where the rocks begin, look for the smooth sloping earthfast boulder (about 20 yards before the mighty nine-ringer of Castleton 7).  Rummage around and you’ll find it.

Archaeology & History

Castleton (7e) carving

This newly recorded petroglyph was rediscovered by Thomas Cleland on August 6, 2025.  Initially it was thought to consist of just a single cup-and-ring with an opening from which a carved line ran outwards; but, once wet, there seemed to be the beginning of an outer second-ring on its left-side.  You can see it clearly in the photos.  And, the more we looked, the more it seemed there were one or two other very faded elements.

Above the main cup-and-ring is a faint, shallow cup-marking and surrounding this appears to be an incomplete dumb-bell-shaped ‘ring’ that you can only just make out in the photos.  It’s very faded and would seem to pre-date the primary design by some considerable time (unless, of course, it was merely ‘outlined’, so to speak and never completed).

Cup & ring & faint ‘bell’
Cup & ring & faint ‘bell’

Both Tom and I are convinced that there’s more to this carving than is presently visible.  The rock is covered in deeply compacted soil and it would require a lot of work to uncover the rest of it.  A job for the future maybe…..

Note to self:  This carving and all the others in the Castleton complex need to be fully re-catalogued as their indexing is haphazard through various academic tomes and websites.

Acknowledgements:  Massive thanks to Thomas Cleland for locating this carving, for the first time in millenia. 🙂

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian

Castleton (10b), Cowie, Stirlingshire

Cup-Marked Stone:  OS Grid Reference – NS 85905 88368

Getting Here

Castleton 10b cup-marks

Follow the directions as if you’re visiting the impressive multi-ringed design of the Castleton (10) carving.  Once there, walk south-east along the geological ridge for 45 yards where the small cliff drops down to the field.  Just where this drop occurs, on a lower horizontal level of the rock face (only a small section) you’ll notice two distinct “cups”.  You can’t really miss it!

Archaeology & History

This very basic cup-marked stone was, until recently, covered in dense gorse, making access to the site almost impossible.  But following a fire that happened here not too long ago, the smoldering remains needed to be cleared and, once the job was done, we were able to see the two distinct ‘cups’ that were first described in Maarten van Hoek’s (1996) survey.  But the cups that he described are, most likely, little more than Nature’s handiwork.  I’m somewhat skeptical of them as being the real deal.  In the same survey, he added another site, which are just natural bowls in the rock just over 100 yards southwest of here as being cup-marks — which they’re not!

 References:

  1. van Hoek, M.A.M.,”Prehistoric Rock Art around Castleton Farm, Airth,” in Forth Naturalist & Historian, volume 19, 1996.

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian

 

Ledard Burn (2), Kinlochard, Aberfoyle, Perthshire

Cup-Marked Stone:  OS Grid Reference – NN 459 035 (?) 

Archaeology & History

In Miss Maitland’s (1935) article on the Ledard Stone carving, she also made a brief mention of “another cup-marked stone (that) lies on the edge of the burn, beyond the one described, above Loch Ard.”  She gave no further information about this second stone.  It remains lost and sounds to be only a short distance further uphill and on the west-side of the burn.  If any local explorers are able to find this carving please let us know and, if possible, add some info and photos of it on our Facebook page. (the grid-reference for this site profile is an approximation)

References:

  1. Maitland, Mrs, “Cup Marked Stones”, in The Scottish Country Woman, 1935.

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian

Ledard Burn (1), Kinlochard, Aberfoyle, Perthshire

Cup-Marked Stone:  OS Grid Reference – NN 458 033

Also Known as:

  1. Ledard Stone

Archaeology & History

Ledard Stone, 1935

This carving hasn’t seen the light of day, seemingly, since it was first reported by a local lady, a Miss Maitland in the 1930s—and who, it transpires, uncovered a number of petroglyphs in this neck of the woods.  She found it on one of her many forays in the mountains hereby and took some old photos of it—although they’ve not reproduced too well for the sake of the site profile. (apologies)

Since Miss Maitland’s days, the hillside has been covered in forestry plantation, making it extremely difficult to locate the carving.  However, due to the reasonably large size of the stone, it should still be there (smaller cup-and-ring stones have been damaged and destroyed by forestry over the years); and as we can see in the middle photo, a long thick vein of quartz runs roughly along the middle of the stone—an ingredient which may have been significant for the people who carved the stone.  In her article in the Scottish Country Woman magazine, Miss Maitland told:

cup-marks, bottom left

Ledard Stone

“On the hill directly behind Ledard, on the north side of Loch Ard, a little to the west of the burn and a little to the east of the first grouse-butt, exactly 700 feet above sea level, lies a large boulder.  Ice has smoothed and fashioned it and on the worn surface may be seen twenty-one, or so, small round hollows, varying in size and depth.  The pattern made is roughly diamond-shaped, pointing directly east and west.  I saw them for the first time as the sun was setting on New Year’s Eve, 1932.  It was a solemn moment, for as far as I know no one else had looked upon them with such joy, and even awe, for perhaps a thousand years!”

She may have been right.  And by the sound of her words, she’d certainly caught the petroglyph bug!

Anyhow, the carving doesn’t appear to have been seen since then.  A “cup-marked boulder” was noted in the Royal Commission’s (1979) listings, but with no further details. We assume it must be the same carving, although they never visited it.  It’s also possible that they were referring to another lost cup-marked stone a short distance further up the hill from here.  If any local explorers are able to re-locate the carving, please let us know, and maybe add some info and photos of it on our Facebook page.

References:

  1. Maitland, Mrs, “Cup Marked Stones”, in The Scottish Country Woman, 1935.
  2. Royal Commission Ancient & Historical Monuments of Scotland, Archaeological Sites and Monuments of Stirling District, Central Region, Society of Antiquaries of Scotland 1979.

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian

Mercat Cross, Doune, Perthshire

Cross:  OS Grid Reference – NN 72704 01570

Also Known as:

  1. Market Cross

Getting Here

Easy to find: get into the middle of the village where the shops are in the main street and where another road veers off, the cross sits there in the middle in the traffic island.  The photo here shows its location clearly.

Archaeology & History

Doune’s Mercat Cross

Found at the meeting of the roads in the centre of this old lovely village, the Mercat Cross in its present state was, according to Act of Parliament, erected a few years prior to 1696.  Set on a square base of six steps in traditional pyramidal fashion, near the top of the 12-foot tall shaft  are carvings on the sides of the stone.  On the east-face was carved the Moray arms, and on the west face were carved sundials.  John Small (1900) told how the top of the cross is crowned by the figure of a lion, “holding in its paws a circular shield or escutcheon, surrounded by a ribbon enclosing he Moray crest, and bearing the motto, ‘Salus per Christum.’

John Small’s 1900 sketch

It has been damaged a few times over the years.  Sometime around 1800, Moray Mackay (1953) told that “the lion fell of and was damaged”, but was repaired shortly afterwards by a local man.  He also told, with considerable indignation, how the local authorities were responsible for damaging what used to be “four short pillars which stood at the corners of the base,” when they were “smashed off and removed , impairing the balance of the whole (cross) for the sake of six inches more traffic room”!  There are two such short pillars at the edges, but these aren’t the original stones.  There used to be a water pump in front of the cross, but this was removed many years ago.

References:

  1. Mackay, Moray S., Doune – Historical Notes, Forth Naturalist: Stirling 1984.
  2. McKenzie, A.F. & S., Doune – Postcards from the Past, Forth Naturalist: Stirling 1988.
  3. Small, John W., Scottish Market Crosses, Eneas Mackay: Stirling 1900.

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian 

Carron Hill, Stenhousemuir, Stirlingshire

Cist (destroyed):  OS Grid Reference – NS 872 825 (approximation)

Antiquarian Notes

Writing in the “Transactions of the Stirling Natural History & Archaeological Society” in 1882, Mr Thomson told:

“About the middle of last month I was informed by Mr Bruce that the Council of the Field Club had asked the rector and myself to go and examine a cist alleged to have been discovered in a field near Stenhousemuir.  I arranged with the rector to go the following Saturday.  As he was suffering from cold, and it was stormy, he was unable to go.  I thought I would risk cold and storm, and at the station met Mr Taylor of Morrison & Taylor, who was just returning to Larbert.  Learning my errand he kindly promised me every assistance.  During tea Miss Taylor procured for me the account of the opening of the cist which had appeared in the Falkirk Herald.  It ran as follows:

“‘Discovery of Human Remains – On Tuesday last, the workmen employed by the Carron Company in excavating the Sand Hills, about a quarter of a mile to the south of the village of Stenhousemuir, made a discovery which has caused some excitement in the district.  At the depth of four feet from the surface the workmen came in contact with a stone coffin or grave, 3 feet 9 inches long by 2 feet broad, very substantially built, and containing the remains of a human body.  When the discovery was made, parts of the skull were in good preservation, but soon after being exposed to the air they  crumbled away.  The remains have been carefully collected, and are now in possession of the workmen at the hut at the Sand Quarry.  On Wednesday a great many people visited the place, prompted by a natural curiosity to see these relies thus suddenly brought to light, the history of which, it is to be feared, must ever remain a mystery. ’”

“After tea, Mr Taylor and I went to the place where the cist was railed off.  It is in the middle of a field acquired by the Carron Company to take sand for their castings from, and the excavation that revealed the cist had been made with a view of getting a new bed of sand.  About 200 yards west of the gate of Carron Park House, and close by a railway for waggons, where the workmen had been digging pits, partly with a view to find, as I understood, the lie of the sand, and partly also to arrange the course of a waggon railway for the new sand pit, they came upon traces of a disturbance in the sand.  On digging down they came upon some large stones.  On lifting them they found some bones, among the rest the top of the skull. The latter was injured somewhat by the spade, and it seems soon to have crumbled away.

“When I went along with Mr Taylor to the spot, which, as we have said, had been railed off by the kindness of Mr Cowan, the manager, we found that the cist had been somewhat dismantled, the upper large stones were lying about the side of the cist, and along with them several smaller ones.  We noted that the depth below the surface had been exaggerated in the Falkirk Herald, from the reporter having failed to notice that the earth had been heaped up on the spot when the present waggon railroad was made.  We measured the cavity carefully: the length was 3 feet 8 inches, the greatest breadth 16½ inches, and the least 14 inches, the greatest depth to the bottom of the stones still standing was 15 inches.  There were three large stones, each about 2 feet by 16 inches, which had been the roof of the cist.  A young man who had watched our movements with some curiosity, went and brought an old man who had been present when the cist was opened — he told us strange tales of how these three large stones had all been one but were “jist fair rotten.”  The fact that the stones showed no signs of ever having been one, and that their thicknesses being different — one being 5 inches, another 7½ inches, and a third 2½ inches — did not unduly disconcert him when questioned by Mr Taylor in cross-examination, but brought out from him the somewhat irrelevant information that he was seventy-nine and had been under “sax managers in Carron, and he should ken a’ aboot it.”  He further declared that the smaller stones had been one stone also.  This was even more difficult to believe, and when he proceeded to tell of a layer of fine powdered lime being laid between the stones we suspected his years had brought dotage, not increase of knowledge.  I learned that the bones had been removed from the hut, and were in the keeping of the manager, so Mr Taylor kindly took me to see him in his house some two miles or so from the place where the cist was found.  He told us that he had arranged for their safe custody, but had never seen them, and asked me to come some other day, not a Saturday.

“I went again on Friday week, and saw another of the workmen, and a gentleman from Carron works.  This other workman had not his friend’s great age, and admitted that the stones were not one originally, and that the small ones formed part of the sides.  If those small stones were built up on the existing walls of the cist, their height would be brought up to about 2 feet in all.

“I noted carefully that the joints were not filled up with clay, and that neglecting the variation of the compass, the cist lay due north and south.  The gentleman who had been sent by Mr Cowan, when asked about the bones, took out of his pocket what seemed a box for holding twelve gross of pens, and opened it; it was filled with a mass of small fragments of bone quite friable and utterly indistinguishable…”

Further Reading:

  1. Royal Commission on the Ancient & Historical Monuments Scotland, Stirling – 2 volumes, HMSO: Edinburgh 1963.
  2. Thomson, J., “The Cist at Stenhousemuir”, in Transactions Stirling Natural History & Archaeological Society, no.4 1882.

Gog and Magog, Loch Ard, Aberfoyle, Perthshire

Cup-Marked Stone (lost):  OS Grid Reference – NN 4808 0140

Archaeology & History

On the south-side of Loch Ard, just a few yards from the entrance to Rob Roy’s Cave (one of several), right by the water’s edge are the natural upstanding pillars known locally as Gog and Magog.  In Peter Joynson’s (1996) work on Aberfoyle, this site is listed as one in a number of unrecorded cup-and-ring stones in the area.  Discovered by a local lady—”the late Mrs Maitland”—here we have,

“two huge stones about 30ft high known as Gog and Magog situated at the mouth of Blan Ross Bay.  They have numerous cup marks, but sadly have disappeared from view as they have been covered by forestry planting.”

This is an increasingly annoying problem that many rock art students are having to contend with!  When we visited the site, the tops of these huge stones were, indeed, covered in depths of mosses and pine needles and the carving is hidden from sight.  When the trees are felled, let’s hope someone can find it!

Folklore

These natural rocks were said to have been two giants that were turned to stone, the story of which seems to have been forgotten…

References:

  1. Joynson, Peter, Local Past, privately printed: Aberfoyle 1996.

© Paul BennettThe Northern Antiquarian